SENIOR, DISCREET CONFLICT WORK FOR LEADERSHIP TEAMS AND BOARDS
Organisations do not bring in external supporSt around conflict lightly.
When CEOs, executive teams or boards decide to do so, it is usually because the issues are politically sensitive, reputationally risky, or sitting at the intersection of leadership, governance and culture.
This is the work I do.
I work with senior leaders, executive teams and boards who need a trusted, discreet partner to help them address conflict in a way that protects authority, decision-making and organisational integrity.
This is not remedial work and it is not a favour. I am brought in because I understand the stakes and can work credibly at the most senior levels.
WHEN TO CALL ME IN
I am typically engaged when:
- conflict is present at senior levels and cannot be handled informally
- tensions between executives, board members or functions are beginning to affect decisions
- trust has been strained but formal escalation would be damaging
- leaders are concerned about risk, governance, or reputational exposure
- HR processes feel necessary but insufficient for what is really going on
Often the question is not whether conflict exists, but how it can be addressed without destabilising leadership or the organisation itself.
WHAT THIS WORK ENABLES
My role is to help senior leaders and organisations work with conflict in a way that strengthens leadership rather than undermines it.
In practice, this means:
- surfacing difficult issues before they harden into positions
- improving the quality of decision-making under pressure
- enabling leaders to stay engaged without becoming reactive or defensive
- reducing the likelihood of escalation into formal or public processes
Over time, organisations develop greater confidence and discipline in how they handle tension, disagreement and challenge at senior levels.
HOW I WORK
My work is grounded in a background in assurance, risk and governance, with a strong focus on regulated environments, alongside professional coaching and conflict practice.
I understand how conflict interacts with:
- accountability and authority
- formal governance structures
- regulatory and reputational risk
- organisational politics and power
This allows me to operate credibly with CEOs, executive teams and boards, and to design interventions that are proportionate, contained and effective.
The work is structured and purposeful. It is not therapy, facilitation theatre or generic leadership development.

GROUNDED IN PRACTICE AND TOOLS
My work is grounded in a background in assurance, risk and governance, with a strong focus on regulated environments, alongside professional coaching and conflict practice.
I understand how conflict interacts with:
- accountability and authority
- formal governance structures
- regulatory and reputational risk
- organisational politics and power
This allows me to operate credibly with CEOs, executive teams and boards, and to design interventions that are proportionate, contained and effective.
The work is structured and purposeful. It is not therapy, facilitation theatre or generic leadership development.
WAYS OF WORKING
Conflict audit
A structured diagnostic used with leadership teams and organisations to surface where conflict, tension and risk are sitting.
The audit provides senior leaders with:
- a clear view of where energy and attention are being lost
- insight into how conflict is currently handled at different levels
- an evidence-based foundation for deciding what intervention is appropriate
It is often used as a precursor to more targeted work with senior teams or boards you can try it: Conflict Audit Tool.
Executive, board and leadership team work
In addition to my main work as set out above I provide bespoke work with CEOs, executive teams, boards and senior leadership groups.
This may include:
- confidential work with senior leaders or chairs, drawing on my background as workplace mediator.
- facilitated sessions where relationships or decision-making are under strain
- support during periods of organisational stress, transition or scrutiny
The emphasis is on containment, clarity and disciplined engagement, not exposure or performative openness.

CLIENT STORY: OVERCOMING CORPORATE TRAUMA
Following a serious breach of trust, the Board was struggling to move forward. Fear, scrutiny and suspicion dominated meetings, and the Chief Executive found it difficult to gain traction or build confidence.
My role
I was referred in to support the Chair and Board. What began as a governance review evolved into a programme of Building Conflict-Ready Teams and Coaching for Conflict. Through one-to-one conversations and group facilitation, I helped Board Members to recognise how past events were shaping their behaviour. Alongside this, I worked with the Chief Executive and senior team using Core Strengths and appreciative inquiry to rebuild trust and clarity.
The turning point
The Board realised they had experienced a corporate trauma. Once that was named, they could separate the past from the present and start working together with greater balance and confidence.
The outcome
The Chief Executive gained space to lead. Board Members became more strategic and supportive, and communication across senior levels improved. Over time, the organisation regained trust, focus and stability.
What this shows
Acting early and compassionately after a crisis prevents fear and suspicion from becoming embedded in governance. With the right support, senior leaders can turn corporate trauma into collective learning.
Chair of the Board
“This was a new experience for us as a Board and Sean's gentle but incisive approach, coupled with an attentive ear made us all feel comfortable and able to speak openly and honestly, which was critical for Board learning and development.
He approached the situation from different angles, encouraging through his questions and exercises, to consider perspectives and alternative options or further areas to reflect upon. This challenged assumptions and comfortably enabled us to move out of a comfort zone to think about where we are and want to be.
It was refreshing as an experience but absolutely instrumental to informing and assisting with all that is involved in embarking upon the next chapter...”
CLIENT STORY: GETTING AHEAD OF THE PROBLEM
A national senior team within a global organisation wanted to strengthen how they worked together. The Director recognised that while nothing was “wrong”, collaboration across silos was limited, and challenge between colleagues sometimes missed the wider context. Left unchecked, these patterns could have led to frustration, disengagement and inefficiency.
My role
As a returning client, the Director asked me to run something more lasting than an away day — something practical that would genuinely improve understanding and trust. I designed a Building Conflict-Ready Teams programme using Core Strengths, with individual coaching followed by a group session.
The turning point
When one team member questioned whether their Core Strengths results were even accurate, it opened up the most powerful insight of the day: that our own perspective isn’t objective truth. Recognising this helped the team reframe difference as diversity of view, not disagreement.
The outcome
The team left energised, laughing, and already applying the language of motivations and conflict sequences to real workplace situations. In the following months, their Director noticed greater empathy, flexibility and understanding in day-to-day communication.
What this shows
Healthy teams don’t wait for conflict to erupt. They build shared understanding before tensions take hold — and learn that different doesn’t mean wrong.
Senior leader
“Sean coached me - and my team - so that I could lead my team on the journey of transformation.
Helping me understand the impact of purpose, values and strengths, Sean enabled me to become a more informed, honest and vulnerable leader.
I will carry his tools and insights with me as I dare to lead other organisations and people.”

IS THIS THE RIGHT FIT?
This work is for organisations that take leadership, governance and risk seriously — including smaller organisations and growing businesses who recognise the cost of unresolved senior-level conflict.
If you are looking for light-touch facilitation, generic training, or something to roll out at scale, this will not be the right approach.
If you are dealing with senior-level conflict that needs to be handled with judgement, discretion and authority, a conversation is the appropriate next step.
